Ruling Expected Next Week in Sheldon Wild Horse Case

Observation location Sheldon Day 1

Observation location Sheldon Day 1

Ruling Expected Next Week in Sheldon Wild Horse Case

(Reno, NV) After a daylong hearing in Reno federal district court, Judge Miranda Du stated that she would give a ruling by next week on the viewing restrictions imposed by Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge to view and report on the horses captured from the range last month being held in corrals at the Refuge.

Testimony given today established that the public was once allowed to view roundups and horses in holding despite the declaration of Refuge manager John Kasbohm. Kasbohm stated in a declaration, and reiterated in testimony, that at no time in the past did Sheldon offer the public viewing at the corrals. Testimony by witnesses brought by attorney Gordon Cowan on behalf of the Plaintiff’s, Laura Leigh journalist for Horseback Magazine and founder of Wild Horse Education and Bonnie Kohleriter and advocate, provided testimony that volunteers had to sign a waiver but that adopters and curious members of the public moved freely around the corrals and were close enough to touch panels.

Sheldon attorneys argued that the need to adopt these animals was no longer a concern of Sheldon staff as they pay adoption contractors (more than $1000. per animal) to take horses and find adopters.

In the underlying complaint Plaintiff’s showed that there is extreme concern among members of the public that not all contractors are finding adoptive homes. An investigation done last year showed that J&S Associates of Mississippi could not account for all horses shipped to them, had not provided appropriate care for foals and that some of the horses sent to J&S did in fact go to auctions (horses that are unhandled and sold in lots most often go to kill buyers that ship horses to slaughter).

Ms. Leigh stated concerns that horses were already being shipped to J&S that had not been photographed by the public. When asked if viewing horses served a positive purpose in the process Ms. Leigh stated that facilitating adoptions was an obvious positive but that accountability to claims made to the public to protect the horses was also a positive role in a Democratic society when it is the government paying for removals and contractors with tax payer funding.

“These are the last of the Sheldon horses,” stated Leigh “Next year they intend to remove the last of these horses that are descendants of our war horses. If the opportunity to tell the story of these horses is lost, it is lost forever.”

The First Amendment claim is part of a larger Complaint that addresses historic and present conduct by Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge that places these symbols of our military history in jeopardy of inappropriate care and slaughter.

The Refuge has already shipped more than half the horses they intend to ship to J&S. Sheldon has not shipped to the contractors that are not subject of scrutiny.

The Refuge plans on removing the last of the horses that inhabit the range by fall of next year.


Wild horse advocates tell US judge feds violated 1st Amendment by denying Nev. mustang access

By SCOTT SONNER  Associated Press
October 10, 2013 – 8:59 pm EDT


RENO, Nevada — Wild horse advocates trying to block shipment of hundreds of mustangs gathered from a national wildlife refuge on the Nevada-Oregon line told a federal judge Thursday the U.S. government is using a “cloak of secrecy” that prevents them from observing the handling of the animals in violation of the First Amendment.

U.S. District Judge Miranda Du denied the critics’ request for an emergency injunction last week, saying they had failed to prove the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service broke any laws at the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge last month when they rounded up more than 400 horses that the advocates fear eventually will be resold for slaughter.

But she agreed to hear nearly five hours of oral arguments again Thursday on the question of whether the agency’s restriction on public and media access to the animals is constitutional. She indicated she has some concerns about the “reasonableness” of the restrictions and expects to issue a ruling next week.

Laura Leigh, a photographer for Horseback Magazine and leader of the Nevada-based Wild Horse Education, said federal officials are using safety concerns as an excuse to keep advocates from documenting mistreatment of the mustangs.

“This is not a safety concern,” Leigh testified in federal court in Reno. “Access has become an issue as controversy rises.”

Leigh said the agency has kept her at least 500 feet away from the temporary holding pens — a distance of nearly two football fields that prevents her from even counting the horses, let alone tell if they are being abused.

“We try to be the eyes and ears to make sure they protect the horses and be accountable to the public, and they are not,” she said. “These horses are being hidden from the public.”

Terri Farley, author of the “Phantom Stallion” youth book series based on wild horses she’s observed over the past two decades, said the restrictions are far more stringent than those she has experienced following herds and similar roundups on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management.

“Sheldon is behind the iron curtain,” she testified. “This cloak of secrecy breeds suspicion.”

Fish and Wildlife Service officials said a two-hour public viewing planned at the pens on Oct. 3 was canceled due to the government shutdown. They said they will attempt to reschedule when the agency’s appropriations are restored, but said more than 100 of the horses already have been shipped to a private contractor and the rest may be gone by then.

Otherwise, the site has always been off limits to the public for safety and security reasons, said John Kasbohm, the refuge’s project director. He said if too many people get too close to the horses, they can become agitated and harm themselves or others.

“There is a concern about the welfare of the horses. It also can endanger people working with the horses in the coral,” he said.

Kasbohm said that since the legal battle began, some horse advocates have threatened on the Internet to release the horses from the pens “in the middle of the night.”

Du said the agency has a right restrict access if the restrictions are narrowly tailored and serve a public interest.

“One of the things I’m struggling with is the qualified right of access,” she said. “Why is 500 feet reasonable? Why not a closer point? … I think the plaintiffs have raised an important issue.” is a Nevada non-profit devoted to gaining protection for wild horses and burros from abuse, slaughter and extinction.

Links of interest:

Wild Horse Education Website:

Website on Sheldon horses:

Categories: Legal, Sheldon NWR